CPRE speaks with forked tongue?

20191221_130235

More of this? A brand new home in Elstead?

The Campaign For The Preservation of Rural England outfit that opposed development on the largest  brown field site in Waverley – wants to build on brown field sites to save the countryside! Can you believe it!

There is no justification for building housing estates in our Green Belt, writes Andy Smith, Surrey branch director of CPRE.

The very same Surrey branch of the CPRE – that has fought ‘Your Waverley’s Local Plan – and in particular the Dunsfold Aerodrome’s new garden village. Fought at public inquiries, fought it in the High Court, and subsequently fought it through  the Appeal Court – and lost.

£300,000 of our money down the pan! But Protect Our Waverley, says “thank you” to its supporters.

Actually although our previous post says it only cost the CPRE £10,000 it did eventually cost it £20,000 in its costs awarded by the judges to Waverley Borough Council. It also cost the Protect Our Waverley Group – £30,000 – which has not yet been paid. All this in addition to the two organisations’ own costs.
This is what the CPRE claims:

The London Green Belt, which covers most of Surrey, is “the countryside next door” for millions of people in and around our capital city. Escaping from urban life into the tranquil countryside improves our health, boosts our mood, and gives us pause to reflect on the world around us.

Crucially, as we are now facing a climate and ecological emergency, the need to revitalise and protect our living green spaces has never been more important.

Our countryside plays a vital role in sequestering carbon and mitigating the worst impacts of climate change, providing space to plant trees and hedgerows, reduce flooding and cool our towns.

Since its creation in the 1950s, our Green Belt has proved a great success by protecting Surrey’s open spaces and reducing the damage of urban sprawl.

Unfortunately, however, it is now under huge pressure from development, with tens of thousands of new houses being earmarked for Green Belt land across Surrey.

Developers – aided by their political allies – make the bogus claim that loosening planning restrictions such as the Green Belt will enable us to build the homes we need.

They argue that if only we could build more houses in the Green Belt there would be no housing shortages. This argument is utter nonsense and bears no relation to reality whatsoever.

In fact, research shows that releasing Green Belt land for housing development does nothing to enable us to meet genuine local housing needs.

Screen Shot 2020-01-28 at 09.42.15.png

By allowing harmful development in our Green Belt, on the false prospectus that it helps to solve the housing crisis, we are squandering a valuable asset at a time when it is needed for our own health and well-being, and to address the climate change crisis.

Instead, as the CPRE report makes clear, we need better solutions to fix the housing crisis, such as building on “brownfield” (previously developed) sites.

Screen Shot 2020-01-28 at 09.43.28.png

In the future it is pertinent to ask those soliciting your vote whether they and their party will pledge to defend the Green Belt if elected. The lesson is clear: Building houses in our Green Belt is not the answer to the housing crisis.

Ask Angela if you live in Guildford and the Waverley eastern villages?

The Space to Breathe report can be downloaded at cpre.org.uk

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.