Our Alfold correspondent was mightily entertained at a recent  meeting of Alfold Parish Council… read on, and if it wasn’t so serious…you could have a good laugh!

The meeting  was called to take soundings of what residents wanted the Parish Council to make to Waverley Borough Council’s consultation on Dunsfold Park’s latest proposal to build 1800 houses at the Aerodrome.

Around 30/ 35 people turned out,  a surprisingly low turn out for such a major application. WW recalls there was standing room only at similar meeting  last year to debate the Thakeham Homes’ application  for  500 homes at Springbok.

Chairman Nik Pidgeon’s impartiality might be called into question as we’re told his opening gambit was to inform those present that he was not in favour of the Dunsfold proposal. No surprises there then!  Councillor Pidgeon has  made no  secret of his opposition to housing at Dunsfold Park and rumour has it that he has had more than a passing professional interest in the Springbok application, which is thought unlikely to succeed if Dunsfold goes ahead. Oh what a tangled web they weave!

As one might expect, most of those present were against  development at Dunsfold, primarily on traffic grounds. However,  a few  brave souls put their heads above the parapet and dared  suggest that Dunsfold’s ambition might be the answer to a few of Alfold’s problems: there was, whisper it who dares, merit in building on a brownfield site to save the village’s green fields, and the provision of a new primary school and doctor’s surgery at Dunsfold Park could replace the primary school Alfold has lost, not to mention the Post Office & General store which is hanging  on by its fingertips! A surgery to prevent villagers having to travel to Cranleigh would also be welcomed. One dare-devil went so far as to point out that traffic on the A281 was already a problem and supporting development at Dunsfold Park might help to alleviate the situation  as a  project of that size had the scope to look at, and deal with, traffic management.

Parish Clerk, Beverley Weddell (she of the Crystal Tipps hair-do – an allusion that will mean nothing to those born after 1974!) expressed carefully worded concern that the Dunsfold application looked very attractive on paper because it ticked a lot of boxes, especially for people in the wider borough – in other words those not living in Alfold or Dunsfold!

Screen Shot 2016-02-12 at 14.04.21.png
Oh No you can’t Mrs A – Oh Yes I can Mr Punch!

Just when our correspondent felt they might die of ennui, if Councillor Betty Ames ,who happenes to lives on the approach road to Dunsfold Park, was allowed to drone on any longer about her action-plan to oppose the application, Chairman Pidgeon, pitched in!  Having tried  repeatedly but  unsuccessfully to interrupt Councillor Ames in her prime, was forced to deliver a knock-out blow, telling her in no uncertain terms to SHUT UP! Way to go Mr Punch!!! Did he succeed? did he hell!

Mention was made of Alfold Parish Council’s joining forces  with neighbouring parish Councils to object to Dunsfold. It was then  poor old Councillor Foryszewski – the former  Waverley Member for Alfold, Cranleigh Rural & Ellens Green, before she jumped ship and swam upstream to her native Cranleigh East – came in for muttered criticism.  Apparently  in her capacity as Chair of Cranleigh Parish Council’s Planning Committee, she over saw that Parish Council’s decision not to comment on Dunsfold Park’s application because it was felt inappropriate for Cranleigh to comment on application’s outside their own Parish. As you might imagine, dear readers, that went down like a tonne of lead bricks in Alfold!

And what of the developer? According to the Clerk, Dunsfold Park had declined an invitation to send a representative along to the Public Meeting. Good call! The man formerly known as the Flying Scotsman, had obviously learned from past mistakes. And who can blame him?  Why step into the Lion’s Den if you don’t need to? A baying crowd of Alfold residents made mincemeat of Thakeham Home’s MD when he dared to think he could persuade them of his company’s charitable credentials in riding to the rescue of Care Ashore at Springbok, all the while refusing to answer questions from the public gallery about how much profit he expected to make out of his charitable venture!

Our Alfold correspondent holds no brief for Dunsfold Park or any of the other developers who are trying to build all over the village’s green and pleasant fields – the latest to jump on the developer bandwagon is Wyvale Garden Centre, who is submitting plans to build houses at its  premises on the Horsham Road in Alfold – but they can see a tiny silver lining in the Dunsfold scheme since the sh*t hit the fan in Alfold. As they explained to us:

With Alfold’s affluent flooded out by Alfold’s effluent, why not ask Dunsfold Park to get them out of the sh*t? Thames Water has admitted the Alfold pumping station can’t cope and is reduced to bringing in lorries to pump out thousands of litres of foul water every time it rains – and, boy, has it rained a lot recently!

Loxwood has told Alfold in no uncertain terms  it doesn’t want their sh*t being pumped down the A281 towards them, so where else can it go?

Thakeham Homes has offered to make Alfold’s No 2s their No 1 priority – in exchange for permission to build hundreds of homes at Springbok – but their solution is to pump it all in the opposite direction up the A281 to Cranleigh, whose own pumping station is also at capacity! So Cranleigh is unlikely to welcome Alfold’s sh*t with open arms either!

Therefore, our Alfold Correspondent humbly suggests that the village gives in gracefully and asks Dunsfold Park to deal with their effluent. After all, the one thing you have to give Dunsfold Park is that no one deals with more crap locally than they do!!!


  1. Why are you anonymous.? I and others would like to know who is behind all the pieces which you write in such an amusing style. Some suspect that you have links to he Flying Scotsman and his team. Please tell us if this is wroing.

    1. WW is anonymous for a variety of reasons not least of which is to ensure we can continue revealing what actually goes on in the hallowed halls of Waverley Borough Council. We write with humour as sometimes, if we did not laugh at WBC, we would cry, and we have no wish to depress everyone in the borough that we all care so much about.
      We have absolutely nothing to do with Scottie, his team, or any other developer – and have no wish to! All of us here at WW want to represent what goes on in Waverley, not just the small corner that is – Dunsfold. However, WW recognises the significant part this site could play in the future development of the borough. WW is In fact critical of the stubborn silence of the canny Scot! So if you know him, please ask him to get in touch, because sorting out the truth from the untruths being peddled about the development over there is very, very, time consuming! WW

  2. What does it matter who writes all the brilliant articles that you do, as I have said before, I believe we are suppose to live a democracy and therefore have freedom of speech. That is why everyone is entitled to their views, I mean ideas not views from your house.
    Perhaps they can find somewhere else to develope i.e allotments or nature reserves. I used to follow Waverley Matters which was on the same vein as WW but that suddenly disappeared overnight, so don’t let anyone find out who you are and keep on going, it’s about time these matters were aired in public and not decided by the select few behind closed doors. I don’t want to repeat myself but please keep up the good work. Truth hurts.

    1. But Waverley Web lets itself down by quite often not being accurate in its comments. Come on Waverleyweb, check your “facts” and just tell the truth. That will make you more believable and maybe respected.

  3. Thank you for the vote of confidence. WW will continue to reflect the concerns of many electors within the borough of Waverley. WBC holds far too many of its discussions and makes far too many decisions behind closed doors. Away from the public gaze. We do not know why Waverley Matters disappeared, only that it was missed. WW has no intention of revealing the identity of the large number of contributors who make up the Waverley Web, some of whom work within, and are as dissatisfied as we are, with the workings of WBC!

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.