Does Surrey County Council wish “Your Waverley’ was responsible for the roads?

 Surrey can’t spell Waverley! It’s official.

When you spend a great deal of time trying to let residents know the difference between what Waverley Borough Council does and what Surrey County Council does…and then you get this sign-in in Farnham is it any surprise that we want to bring about change in the May elections?

Or perhaps Surrey’s head honchos who a while back wanted to create a unitary authority for the county decided that perhaps if Waverly and other borough councils actually had the responsibility for caring for our pot-holed roads it knew of someone who could do it better? 
No doubt the Waverly County Council in Wisconsin, West Virginia? Or perhaps Waverly Council in South Dakota – or better still how about Waverly in Nebraska! 
Or step forward to the country where they know all about road building – Waverly Gauteng in South Africa?
Perhaps this Cranleigh & Ewhurst County Councillor is responsible for the Spelling Bees at County Towers? Because this is his official title on his web page!
For all the confused souls in our town – the road network is the responsibility of Surrey and not Waverley! But to say Surrey manages our road is a bit of an exaggeration!

 

 

One thought on “Does Surrey County Council wish “Your Waverley’ was responsible for the roads?”

  1. We weren’t blaming him for the misspelling of the sign Mr Moo just his inability to spell the village he represents with a capital E. However, we are sorry you didn’t find it amusing – but then a great many people over there in the eastern villages don’t find it very amusing having a county councillor who seems to enjoy the title more than the job? Perhaps we should post on that?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.